‘The same characteristics come up again and again. It is almost invariably a gang activity, often involving weapons, usually against a white victim on their own...
‘There is evidence that they [Asians] are trying to create exclusive areas for themselves. We have experience of comments such as “Whites keep out.” Anyone seems to be a target if they are white and they are vulnerable. We have even had mothers pushing prams under attack.’
Chief Superintendent Eric Hewitt, quoted in Oldham’s Evening Chronicle, 17 March 1998
|Statements like these are quoted by Nationalists because making similar observations themselves risks two years’ imprisonment under|
The Zionist Board of Deputies of British Jews formulated the ‘Race Laws’ which now amend the Public Order Act and various other Statutes. The first Race Relations Bill was introduced into the House of Commons by the Labour Attorney General, the immigrant Russian Jew Sir Frank Soskice in 1965. Draconian amendments to the Race Relations Act of 1976 (which, for example, removed from the Crown the need to prove ‘intent’ in prosecutions for ‘Incitement to Racial Hatred’) was passed in the House of Commons with only 132 of the 635 Members being present. It is well known that numerous M.P.’s are privately opposed to the Race Relations law but they were terrified that if they went to the House and spoke up and voted against the amendments they would be:
... so on that crucial occasion 80% of our M.P.’s hid away in their funk holes. It is thanks to these craven traitors that the Jews are able to make a farce of Parliament and get their way even against the wishes of the vast majority of the British people.
A subsequent series of amendments to the Act were introduced to the House of Commons in 1986 by the Lithuanian Jew Home Secretary Leon Brittan(isky) – now a European Community Commissioner.
You may wonder why all the various amendments to the Race Relations Act have had such extensive backing from the Home Office. Quite apart from the Jewish Home Secretaries and campaigning by pressure groups such as the Jewish Board of Deputies, there is the crucial factor of the behind-the-scenes influence of Jewish Civil Servants – one in particular being Neville Nagler.
Throughout the 1970s and 1980s Nagler was the head of the Home Office Department responsible for race relations matters. The Jewish Chronicle has boasted of the influence of this Pinner, Middlesex, Synagogue official. It revealed that whenever a Cabinet Minister made a speech on the subject of race relations, notes for the text were always drafted by Nagler. The J.C. also made it clear that Nagler regularly “liased” with top officials of the Jewish Board of Deputies. These reports only confirmed anti-Immigration campaigners’ suspicions as to why the Board of Deputies was so well-informed about their activities, personnel and personal circumstances. The Board often betrayed (through its subsidiary organisations and publications, as well as through the boastful columns of the Jewish Chronicle) knowledge which could only have been gained through official (i.e.: Police / Special Branch / M.I.5) facilities. The Home Office, obviously, has right of access to these intelligence data sources.
Patriots were given further grounds for consternation when it was betrayed in the J.C. early in 1991 that Nagler had retired from the Home Office and had been appointed full-time paid Chief Executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews!
From The Longest Hatred: An Examination of Anti-Gentilism, published and with a Foreword by the Lady Dowager Jane Birdwood