|
Excerpts fromGamesmanshipStephen Potter |
CHESSThe prime object of gamesmanship in chess must always be, at whatever sacrifice, to build up your reputation. In our small chess community in Marylebone it would be modesty on my part to deny that I have built up for myself a considerable name without ever actually having won a single game. Even the best players are sometimes beaten, and that is precisely what happens to me. Yet it is always possible to make it appear that you have lost your game for the games sake. Regarded la Dame Play This is done by affecting anxiety over the wiseness of your opponents move. An occasional Are you sure you meant that? or Your castle wont like that in six moves time works wonders. By arrangement with another gamesman I have made an extraordinary effect on certain of our Marylebone Chess Club Rambles by appearing to engage him in a contest without board. In the middle of a country lane I call out to him P to Q3, then a quarter of an hour later he calls back to me Q to QB5; and so on. Moves, of course, can be invented arbitrarily.
Potters Opening This is supposed, now, to be the name of an effective opening, simple to play and easy to remember, which I have invented for use against a more experienced player who is absolutely certain to win. It consists of making three moves at random and then resigning. The dialogue runs as follows:
It is no exaggeration to say that this gambit, boldly carried out against the expert, heightens the reputation of the gamesman more effectively than the most courageous attempt to fight a losing battle. |
|
Stephen Potter, Gamesmanship, 1947 |