The airship known as the LZ 129 Hindenburg was an ultra-modern invention that conquered the world and then crashed to earth in a spectacular fireball. The same thing explains both its initial dazzling success and its ultimate damning failure: it was filled with a highly dangerous gas. Hydrogen is very easy to manufacture and has immense lifting-power. But it’s not only the lightest of gases, it’s one of the most inflammable too. On 6th May 1937, after another triumphant crossing of the Atlantic, the Hindenburg was coming in to land at an air-base in New Jersey when it caught fire and exploded.
Shall I compare Tony Blair to the Hindenburg? Let me count the ways: ultra-modern... conquered the world... filled with highly dangerous gas... crashed to earth in a spectacular fireball. Okay, as I write this, Blair hasn’t crashed in a spectacular fireball yet, but flames are licking at his gas-filled fuselage and it can only be a matter of time. Earlier in September, a memo by his public-relations team was leaked to The Daily Mirror. It revealed the scheming for Blair to leave office on a “wave of euphoria” in mid-2007, after the tenth anniversary of his first general election victory. I predict Blair will leave office on a wave of ordure well before then and take his rightful place in history as the greatest of all British prime ministers – the greatest liar, the greatest deceiver and the greatest failure.
The memo is a perfect symbol of what will earn him that place in history. The men who wrote it are lying even to themselves:
His genuine legacy is not the delivery, important though that is, but the dominance of new Labour ideas – the triumph of Blairism.
That “delivery” is important goes without saying. Those who stress its importance reveal that they don’t really think it’s important at all. After all, how can Blairism have “triumphed” unless Blair has delivered? Well, by Blair’s own relentlessly narcissistic standards, Blairism has indeed triumphed: he himself has appeared everywhere in the media for nine years and is now one of the ten or fifteen most famous men in the world. Take this further extract from the memo:
As TB enters his final phase he needs to be focusing way beyond the finishing line, not looking at it. He needs to go with the crowds wanting more. He should be the star who won’t even play that last encore.
So there you have it: Blair should be “the star who won’t even play that last encore.” Blairism isn’t simply politics as show business but politics as one of the shallowest, flashiest and most insincere forms of show business – pop music. And guess what? Lord Levy, the millionaire Jew who funded Blair’s rise to the top, made his fortune as a pop impresario with monuments of bad taste like Alvin Stardust and Buster Bloodvessel. After Levy sold his company Magnet Records he spotted another potential star, his “Laddie in Red” Tony Blair, the former lead-singer and guitarist in the failed rock band Ugly Rumours. So Levy lavishly funded Blair’s private office in opposition while another of the Jewish Svengalis controlling Blair, the spin-doctor Peter “Prince of Darkness” Mandelson, began to remould the Labour party in his own devious and deceitful image.
The result was called New Labour, but “Jew Labour” would be much closer to the truth. Mandelson went on to achieve the unprecedented feat of leaving office in disgrace not once but twice. Despite this, he is now spinning his webs in Brussels and Strasbourg as one of Britain’s Euro-commissioners. That’s a little too far for him to take part effectively in day-to-day management of Blair in London, so the Jews have stuck to their age-old rule of “Lots of Our Own Close to the Throne” and moved David Miliband, son of the Marxist theoretician Ralph Miliband, into his place.
Sinister Sheeney eyes Simpleton Shabbas-Goy:
Political pustules David Miliband and Tony Blair
Miliband acts regularly as Blair’s spokesman, just as his fellow sheeney Oliver Letwin does for the Conservative leader David Cameron, and is touted as a possible Labour leader and prime minister. If Gordon Brown ousts Blair, Miliband can expect a long period in exile but that won’t stop lots of Jews being close to the throne. As I pointed out in my previous column, the “venture capitalist” Ronald Cohen is funding Brown’s bid for the leadership and Brown too will have to do as he’s told by the Chosen Ones. But there are signs that Britain’s Jews are worried that their control over white politicians is slipping. Contemplating the struggle for power in JuLabour, the British neo-con Melanie Phillips has once again demolished that old lie of “dual loyalty”:
The crucial question at this point in world history is whether the British government post-Blair will be as staunchly Atlanticist as he has been. Gordon Brown is known to have stars and stripes in his eyes, although ominously he has also let it be known that he would ditch support for certain aspects of US policy. For all his faults, Blair has displayed astounding courage and clear-mindedness in never wavering from his support for American foreign policy, despite the fury this has engendered among the voters and the consequent damage this has done to his whole political career. The key issue now in British politics is whether his successor – whoever it will be – will do the same. (www.melaniephillips.com, 5th September 2006)
Mel doesn’t have a dual loyalty at all: she clearly puts Israel and her own tribe far ahead of Britain and its interests. “American foreign policy” means “wars for Israel” and waging wars for Israel has been extremely bad for the Whites of Britain and America. Blair has done things on behalf of Jews that may be impossible to repair, from blowing the floodgates of mass immigration off their hinges to allying Britain with George Bush’s Krusade for Kikistan. And just like Bush, Blair could not have won office or held it so long without the steady support of Jews. The extremely rich and greedy Jewish businessmen who backed Blair did not get where they are by being poor judges of character and they must have been able to see what Blair was like. But they didn’t care, because Blair would supply what they wanted. This deadly analysis of Blair’s character indicts them as much as it indicts him:
I believe Tony Blair is an out-and-out rascal, terminally untrustworthy and close to being unhinged. I said from the start that there was something wrong in his head, and each passing year convinces me more strongly that this man is a pathological confidence-trickster. To the extent that he ever believes what he says, he is delusional. To the extent that he does not, he is an actor whose first invention – himself – has been his only interesting role. (Matthew Parris, The Times, 18th March 2006)
In fact, I’m reminded of the saying “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” Blair, Bush and other traitors aren’t killing the White race, their Jewish paymasters are. Blair and Bush are only symptoms: the underlying disease is Jewish control of Western politics and media. Blair’s departure will be like the disappearance of a single pustule on the face of a plague victim. It won’t mean health is returning to a diseased body, because another pustule will immediately take its place as the plague victim slides further toward death.